| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Zarnak Wulf
   |
Posted - 2011.06.11 19:05:00 -
[1]
The dramiel's DPS is exagerated. The real reason people hate it is it's GTFO ability. I like the proposed change because it doesn't hit the ship with a nerf hammer. Hopefully CCP has the mental fortitude to ignore the "Kill It with a Nerf Bat!" crowd.
|
Zarnak Wulf
|
Posted - 2011.06.18 14:42:00 -
[2]
I don't know how anyone can be surprised that the dram is getting needed. Really?!? CCP's fault for letting it go on and on and on....
|
Zarnak Wulf
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 23:47:00 -
[3]
CCP Tallest: Can we get dedicated stickies for various topics? Otherwise this thread will be overrun with supercarriers, hybrids, gallant, AF, EAF, ect.
|
Zarnak Wulf
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 14:11:00 -
[4]
Paging CCP Tallest. Paging CCP Tallest...
|
Zarnak Wulf
|
Posted - 2011.07.13 14:59:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Zarnak Wulf on 13/07/2011 14:59:37
 Originally by: Rostin
Leave the dramiels alone - if you think its overpowered just start fly it! Easy.
That ship is one of most expensive frigates and I see lot of killed dramiels on KB. I suppose its superior to other frigates, but the price is adequately higher. Its fair.
Obvious troll. Price has never been an acceptable balancing argument. During the nano age pimped out crows would come in around 200 million isk. I could still kill them in my 15 million isk Thrasher. Those nano crows still got nerfed. And so will the dramiel. Have a nice day. 
|
Zarnak Wulf
|
Posted - 2011.07.24 14:08:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Zarnak Wulf on 24/07/2011 14:08:41
DPS. Tanking. Speed. Pick 2 of the three for the Dramiel. It currently has all three. I would not mind if the Dramiel maintained it's DPS and dual prop status - IF it lost the ability to fit a MSE. I similarly would not mind if the Dramiel kept it's DPS and hit points - IF it lost it's GTGO ability. In short - it can't continue to 'have it all'
|
Zarnak Wulf
|
Posted - 2011.08.01 15:11:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Mutnin
Why not start by doing away with the tier system? If there is one single thing that makes a vast majority of ships with-in EVE next to useless it is the tier system.
Each ship should fill a role that can be useful, rather than just be a gimped ship that only fills a slot in an out dated tier system. If you want to re-balance ships start by making the bulk of them useful.
Start with the frigs and work your way up.
I'd rather they spent their time on things other then this. When you get into the ships, it's more other issues then the tier system. Take Minmatar -
Frigates:
- Burst - bare bones to see if you're interested in mining. You need to be out of this in a week. Really.
- Slasher - Super fast and super cheap. Overheating you can get it to 6.3km/s. Not bad tackle for a 30k isk ship.
- Vigil - Let's face it. If the target painter weren't a lame e-war or if the ship got a different e-war then this frigate would be a much nicer ship. Noone complains about the Griffin.
- Finally, the two DPS frigates are very different. The breacher is a missile spammer that can hit way out and the rifter is a gun boat.
In short, if CCP were to do an e-war overhaul I wouldn't have a problem with the above.
Cruisers:
- Scythe - needs a different logistics bonus.
- Bellicose - Same problem as the vigil. An e-war overhaul would redo the ship.
- And the Stabber and Rupture, again, are two very different ships with different pros and cons.
Again, the above ships need a logistics and e-war makeover - not a complete remake. I'd rather CCP look at hybrids, hybrid platforms, supercarriers, etc.
|
Zarnak Wulf
|
Posted - 2011.08.05 13:57:00 -
[8]
Didn't CCP Tallest get back from vacation on the 2nd? "Warriors, Come out and Plaaaaay!"
|
Zarnak Wulf
|
Posted - 2011.08.11 16:41:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Ravcharas
Two months and counting to change the warp speed of logis. Seriously, what's going on over there?
CCP Tallest is currently decomposing in my cargohold. Sorry.
|
| |
|